What exactly do you mean by that?It's mainly our fault that got us in this (as in the western countries).
I think every country should just band together and bomb the crap out of them if I'm honest. It may end up killing innocent victims, but we shouldn't bomb them and allow them to keep coming over and planting bombs everywhere, which in turn kill even more innocent people? Either way, innocent people are going to be killed unfortunately.
The problem is that either way innocent people are going to be killed. We can either have people in Syria and such being killed, or we can have people in the more "modern" (whatever you want to call it) countries being killed by their terrorist attacks. Let me set the record straight, I still don't think it's OK nor is it fair for the poor innocent people living in Syria and such. I feel bad for them too. However, those places are causing a lot of problems for other countries (France being the latest as well). Maybe other countries ignited their spark, but they fired back. It's like a cat trying to chase its own tail... Someone or something has to break the pattern here.
I agree fully with your views Zach. I feel like there's another problem as well, and it is, how are we going to get terrorists away if we don't kill civilians? Let's be realistic here, we can't go individually searching for terrorists and trying to take them out. We would clearly need troops on foot for that, and everyone wants to avoid that because the more white people that enter the country, the more they will become targets. So of course, air strikes make the most sense. And what will come with air strikes? Random targets. There's no way to avoid it. If there is to be believed that a terrorist is there, you have to go in. There's just no way to filter out innocent civilians, because no matter what, they're most likely going to go down with the terrorists.